【Planning】APO data - inconsistent new codes - TS, Peg/planning file entry

Purpose

At times for many reason, inconsistence may happen b/t R3 and APO. here we don't want to look into detail of CIF or cockip how to ensure the consistence between these 2 systems, as it is a big deal we can cover in many posts later.

this article is to solve the issue, for example, if new material code CIFed/created into APO. By that time, if we want to use DP/SNP etc., we must have many master data ready and available.

This is not user-afford actions, mostly it should be performed by consultant - as it is much more technical even complex if we really want to know the core functionalities.

Here only documents some few points.


Content

1). no Livecache anchor

below is one possible case: (but not only)

we can execute the program - /SAPAPO/TS_LCM_CONS_CHECK to repair the LCA:

or we can use /MC62 to adjust time series when create CVC


2). CCR to correct inconsistence

Master or transaction data not consistent

/N/SAPAPO/CCR or program (/SAPAPO/CIF_DELTAREPORT3



then you can repair using above buttons.


3). planning file entry/pegkey

in APO, order data does not contain the id, like product, location, etc...instead it contains the pegkey.

it is like Planning file entry in R3.

if it is missed, we may encounter below error



we can run Program: /SAPAPO/SAPRRP_NETCH to repair:

Machine generated alternative text:
Planning File Entries
?umberofEntries
Selectn
Planning Version 000 !
Product ,[.84960000 ]1? I
Location mail 1??I ____________________ ?
Production Planner 憈o fl
ZI With Planning File Entry
Maximum no. of hits 2501
Control Parameters
JDisplay Planning File
Ri Create Pegging Areas

Machine generated alternative text:
Display Planning File Entries
aWi J4 
Pegging Areas for Version 000
PIFIEnPPDS Product a Location S AcAssgtObj PlngSegTyp Prod.Plnnr PP/DSLWLvC SNPLLvIC PIFIEntSNP PIFIEntBOP PFE FCheck Package Heuristic Part Pack.
El B4960O00 U011 0 0 X SAP_PP_002

now we run again for LLC:



请使用浏览器的分享功能分享到微信等