【MySQL】死锁案例之四

  • 杨奇龙

    2017-09-18 12:03:57
  • MySQL
  • 原创
一 前言
  死锁，其实是一个很有意思，也很有挑战的技术问题，大概每个DBA和部分开发同学都会在工作过程中遇见过 。关于死锁我会持续写一个系列的案例分析，希望能够对想了解死锁的朋友有所帮助。本文介绍一例三个并发insert 导致的死锁，根本原因还是在于insert 唯一键申请插入意向锁这个特殊的GAP锁。其实称呼插入意向锁 为 Insert Intention Gap Lock 更为合理。
二 案例分析
2.1 环境准备 
Percona server 5.6 RR模式
  1. CREATE TABLE `t6` (
  2.   `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  3.   `a` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  4.   PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  5.   unique KEY `idx_a` (`a`)
  6. ) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=1 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
  7. insert into t6 values(1,2),(2,8),(3,9),(4,11),(5,19)

sess1

sess2

sess3

begin;



insert into t6(id,a) values(6,15);

begin;



insert into t6(id,a) values(7,15);

begin;



insert into t6(id,a) values(8,15);

rollback; 


ERROR 1213 (40001): Deadlock found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction


2.2 死锁日志
  1. ------------------------
  2. LATEST DETECTED DEADLOCK
  3. ------------------------
  4. 2017-09-18 10:03:50 7f78eae30700
  5. *** (1) TRANSACTION:
  6. TRANSACTION 462308725, ACTIVE 18 sec inserting, thread declared inside InnoDB 1
  7. mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
  8. LOCK WAIT 4 lock struct(s), heap size 1184, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
  9. MySQL thread id 3825465, OS thread handle 0x7f78eaef4700, query id 781148519 localhost root update
  10. insert into t6(id,a) values(7,15)
  11. *** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
  12. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308725 lock_mode X insert intention waiting
  13. *** (2) TRANSACTION:
  14. TRANSACTION 462308726, ACTIVE 10 sec inserting, thread declared inside InnoDB 1
  15. mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
  16. 4 lock struct(s), heap size 1184, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
  17. MySQL thread id 3825581, OS thread handle 0x7f78eae30700, query id 781148528 localhost root update
  18. insert into t6(id,a) values(8,15)
  19. *** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):
  20. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308726 lock mode S
  21. *** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
  22. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308726 lock_mode X insert intention waiting
  23. *** WE ROLL BACK TRANSACTION (2)
2.3 死锁分析
首先依然要再次强调insert 插入操作的加锁逻辑。
第一阶段: 唯一性约束检查，先申请LOCK_S + LOCK_ORDINARY
第二阶段: 获取阶段一的锁并且insert成功之后,插入的位置有Gap锁:LOCK_INSERT_INTENTION,为了防止其他insert唯一键冲突。
               新数据插入:LOCK_X + LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP
对于insert操作来说，若发生唯一约束冲突，则需要对冲突的唯一索引加上S Next-key Lock。从这里会发现，即使是RC事务隔离级别，也同样会存在Next-Key Lock锁，从而阻塞并发。然而，文档没有说明的是，对于检测到冲突的唯一索引，等待线程在获得S Lock之后，还需要对下一个记录进行加锁，在源码中由函数row_ins_scan_sec_index_for_duplicate进行判断.
其次 我们需要了解 锁的兼容性矩阵。

从兼容性矩阵我们可以得到如下结论:
  1. INSERT操作之间不会有冲突。
  2. GAP,Next-Key会阻止Insert。
  3. GAP和Record,Next-Key不会冲突
  4. Record和Record、Next-Key之间相互冲突。
  5. 已有的Insert锁不阻止任何准备加的锁。
这个案例是三个会话并发执行的，我打算一步一步来分析每个步骤执行完之后的事务日志。
第一步 sess1 执行插入操作
insert into t6(id,a) values(6,15);
  1. ---TRANSACTION 462308737, ACTIVE 5 sec
  2. 1 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 0 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
  3. MySQL thread id 3825779, OS thread handle 0x7f78eacd9700, query id 781149440 localhost root init
  4. show engine innodb status
  5. TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308737 lock mode IX
因为第一个插入的语句，所以唯一性冲突检查通过，成功插入(6,15). 此时sess1 会话持有(6,15)的LOCK_X|LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP锁。参考"INSERT sets an exclusive lock on the inserted row. This lock is an index-record lock, not a next-key lock (that is, there is no gap lock) and does not prevent other sessions from inserting into the gap before the inserted row."

第二步 sess2 执行插入操作
insert into t6(id,a) values(7,15);
  1. ---TRANSACTION 462308738, ACTIVE 4 sec inserting
  2. mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
  3. LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
  4. MySQL thread id 3825768, OS thread handle 0x7f78ea9c9700, query id 781149521 localhost root update
  5. insert into t6(id,a) values(7,15)
  6. ------- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 4 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
  7. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308738 lock mode S waiting
  8. ------------------
  9. TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308738 lock mode IX
  10. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308738 lock mode S waiting
  11. ---TRANSACTION 462308737, ACTIVE 66 sec
  12. 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
  13. MySQL thread id 3825779, OS thread handle 0x7f78eacd9700, query id 781149526 localhost root init
  14. show engine innodb status
  15. TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308737 lock mode IX
  16. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308737 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
首先sess2的insert 申请了IX锁，因为sess1 会话已经插入成功并且持有唯一键 a=15的X 行锁 ，故而sess2 insert 进行唯一性检查，先申请LOCK_S + LOCK_ORDINARY ,事务日志列表中提示lock mode S waiting
第三部 sess3 执行插入操作
insert into t6(id,a) values(8,15);
  1. ---TRANSACTION 462308739, ACTIVE 3 sec inserting
  2. mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
  3. LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
  4. MySQL thread id 3825764, OS thread handle 0x7f78ea593700, query id 781149555 localhost root update
  5. insert into t6(id,a) values(8,15)
  6. ------- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 3 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
  7. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308739 lock mode S waiting
  8. ------------------
  9. TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308739 lock mode IX
  10. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308739 lock mode S waiting
  11. ---TRANSACTION 462308738, ACTIVE 35 sec inserting
  12. mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
  13. LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
  14. MySQL thread id 3825768, OS thread handle 0x7f78ea9c9700, query id 781149521 localhost root update
  15. insert into t6(id,a) values(7,15)
  16. ------- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 35 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
  17. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308738 lock mode S waiting
  18. ------------------
  19. TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308738 lock mode IX
  20. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308738 lock mode S waiting
  21. ---TRANSACTION 462308737, ACTIVE 97 sec
  22. 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
  23. MySQL thread id 3825779, OS thread handle 0x7f78eacd9700, query id 781149560 localhost root init
  24. show engine innodb status
  25. TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308737 lock mode IX
  26. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308737 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
与会话sess2 的加锁申请流程一致，都在等待sess1释放锁资源。
第四步 sess1 执行回滚操作，sess2 不提交
sess1 rollback;
此时sess2 插入成功，sess3出现死锁，此时sess2 insert插入成功,还未提交,事务列表如下:
  1. ------------
  2. TRANSACTIONS
  3. ------------
  4. Trx id counter 462308744
  5. Purge done for trx s n:o < 462308744 undo n:o < 0 state: running but idle
  6. History list length 1866
  7. LIST OF TRANSACTIONS FOR EACH SESSION:
  8. ---TRANSACTION 462308737, not started
  9. MySQL thread id 3825779, OS thread handle 0x7f78eacd9700, query id 781149626 localhost root init
  10. show engine innodb status
  11. ---TRANSACTION 462308739, not started
  12. MySQL thread id 3825764, OS thread handle 0x7f78ea593700, query id 781149555 localhost root cleaning up
  13. ---TRANSACTION 462308738, ACTIVE 75 sec
  14. 5 lock struct(s), heap size 1184, 3 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
  15. MySQL thread id 3825768, OS thread handle 0x7f78eadce700, query id 781149608 localhost root cleaning up
  16. TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308738 lock mode IX
  17. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308738 lock mode S
  18. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308738 lock mode S
  19. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308738 lock_mode X insert intention
  20. RECORD LOCKS space id 227 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_a` of table `test`.`t6` trx id 462308738 lock mode S locks gap before rec
死锁的原因
 sess1 insert成功并针对a=15的唯一键加上X锁。
 sess2 执行insert 插入(6,15), 在插入之前进行唯一性检查发现和sess1的已经插入的记录重复键需要申请LOCK_S|LOCK_ORDINARY, 但与sess1 的(LOCK_X | LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP)冲突,加入等待队列,等待sess1 释放锁。
 sess3 执行insert 插入(7,15), 在插入之前进行唯一性检查发现和sess1的已经插入的记录重复键需要申请LOCK_S|LOCK_ORDINARY, 但与sess1 的(LOCK_X | LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP)冲突,加入等待队列,等待sess1 释放锁。
 sess1 执行rollback, sess1 释放索引a=15 上的排他记录锁(LOCK_X | LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP),此后 sess2和sess3 获得S锁(LOCK_S|LOCK_ORDINARY)成功,sess2和sess3都要请求索引a=15上的排他记录锁(LOCK_X | LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP),日志中提示 lock_mode X insert intention。由于X锁与S锁互斥，sess2和sess3都等待对方释放S锁，于是出现死锁，MySQL 选择回滚其中之一。

四 总结
    死锁分析是已经很有挑战的事情，尤其对于insert 唯一键冲突,要分多个阶段去申请，也要理解锁的兼容矩阵。对于这块我还有需要在学习了解的知识点，本文算是抛砖引玉，如有分析理解不正确的地方，望大家指正。

推荐文章 《MySQL insert 锁机制》 《insert into 加锁机制》
请使用浏览器的分享功能分享到微信等