Troubleshooting: High Version Count Issues [ID 296377.1]

		修改时间 03-NOV-2011 类型 TROUBLESHOOTING 状态 PUBLISHED

In this Document
  Purpose
  Last Review Date
  Instructions for the Reader
  Troubleshooting Details
     What is shared SQL ?
     What is 'SQL Metadata'?
     How do I see the versions and why they are not shared ?
     What do the reasons given in v$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR mean?
     Version_rpt script.:
     What further tracing is available.
     Are there any times when a high version count is expected even though BINDS are being used?
  References

Applies to:

Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition - Version: 10.2.0.1 to 11.2.0.3 - Release: 10.2 to 11.2
Oracle Server - Standard Edition - Version: 10.2.0.1 to 11.2.0.3 [Release: 10.2 to 11.2]
Oracle Server - Personal Edition - Version: 10.2.0.1 to 11.2.0.3 [Release: 10.2 to 11.2]
Information in this document applies to any platform.

Purpose

The Troubleshooting Guide is provided to assist in debugging SQL sharing issues. When possible, diagnostic tools are included in the document to assist in troubleshooting problems. This document does not contain bugs/patches as these topics are addressed in the articles referenced at the bottom of this document.

Last Review Date

November 3, 2011

Instructions for the Reader

A Troubleshooting Guide is provided to assist in debugging a specific issue. When possible, diagnostic tools are included in the document to assist in troubleshooting.

Troubleshooting Details

What is shared SQL ?

The first thing to remember is that all SQL is implicitly sharable. When a SQL statement is entered, the RDBMS will create a hash value for text of the statement and that hash value then helps the RDBMS to easily find SQL already in the shared pool. It is not in the scope of this article to discuss this in any great detail, so let's just assume entering a series of text results in a hash value being created

For instance :- 'select count(*) from emp' hashes to the value 4085390015

We now create a parent cursor for this sql and a single child. It does not matter that a SQL statement may never be shared - when it is first parsed a parent and a single child are created. The easy way to think of this is that the PARENT cursor is a representation of the hash value and the child cursor(s) represent the metadata for that SQL

What is 'SQL Metadata'?

Metadata is all the information which enables a statement to run. For instance, in the example I have given EMP is owned by scott and therefore has an OBJECT_ID which points to the EMP table owned by this user. When the user SCOTT logged in, optimizer parameters are initialised in that session for use by the statement, so this too is used by the optimizer and is therefore metadata. There are other examples of Metadata which will be mentioned further in this document.

Let's say this session logs out and back in again now. It then runs the same command again (as the same user). This time we already have the SQL in the shared pool (but we don't know this yet). What we do is hash the statement and then search for that hash value in the shared pool. If we find it, we can then search through the children to determine if any of them are usable by us (ie the metadata is the same). If it is, then we can share that SQL statement
I would still have one version of that SQL in the shared pool because the metadata enabled me to share the statement with the already existent child. The fundementals are that the parent is not shared, it is the children which determine shareability.

Now - another user 'TEST' has it's own version of EMP. If that user was to now run the select statement above then what would happen is :-

1. The statement is hashed - it is hashed to the value 4085390015
2. The SQL will be found in the shared pool as it already exists
3. The children are scanned (at this point we have one child)
4. Because the OBJECT_ID of the EMP table owned by TEST is different the OBJECT_ID owned by scott we have a 'mismatch'

(Essentially, what happens here is that we have a linked list of children which we move through in turn, comparing the metadata of the current SQL with that of all the children. If there were 100 children then we would scan each of them (looking for a possible mismatch and moving on) until we found one we could share. If we cannot share any (ie. have exhausted the list of children) then we need to create a new child)

5. We therefore have to create a new child - we now have 1 PARENT and 2 CHILDREN.

How do I see the versions and why they are not shared ?

Lets use the example above and take a look at what SQL we can use to see this in the shared pool.

SCOTT runs select count(*) from emp

I can now run the following to see the PARENT statement and it's hash value and address

select sql_text, hash_value,address from v$sqlarea where sql_text like 'select count(*) from emp%';

SQL_TEXT HASH_VALUE ADDRESS
------------------------------------- ----------------
select count(*) from emp 4085390015 0000000386BC2E58

To see the CHILDREN (I expect to see 1 at this point) :-

9i - select * from v$sql_shared_cursor where kglhdpar = '0000000386BC2E58'

10G - select * from v$sql_shared_cursor where address = '0000000386BC2E58'

ADDRESS          KGLHDPAR         U S O O S L S E B P I S T A B D L T R I I R L I O S M U T N F 
---------------- ---------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
0000000386BC2D08 0000000386BC2E58 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

We can see we have a single child (ADDRESS 0000000386BC2D08). The mismatch information (USOOSL etc) is all N because this is the first child. Now, if I log in as another user and run the same select (select count(*) from emp) and look again I will get the following output:-

ADDRESS          KGLHDPAR         U S O O S L S E B P I S T A B D L T R I I R L I O S M U T N F 
---------------- ---------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
0000000386BC2D08 0000000386BC2E58 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 
0000000386A91AA0 0000000386BC2E58 N N N N N N N N N N N N N Y N N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N

We can now see the 2nd child ( 0000000386A91AA0) and also the reasons why it could not be shared with the first (The 'Y's denote a mismatch). The reasons are:

(1) AUTH_CHECK_MISMATCH and
(2) TRANSLATION_MISMATCH

This is because the objects under my new user do not map to those of SCOTT (the current child). A mismatch occurs because I cannot access SCOTTs objects and translation fails since we have different object_ids for the objects in each of our schemas.

You can also use the following article to show details of the versions for a particular cursor:

Note:438755.1 Formatted V$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR Report by SQLID or Hash Value (Doc ID 438755.1)

What do the reasons given in v$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR mean?

Below are the list of reasons as well as some worked examples (Those denoted by ** are the ones most often seen) :-

UNBOUND_CURSOR - The existing child cursor was not fully built (in other words, it was not optimized)
SQL_TYPE_MISMATCH - The SQL type does not match the existing child cursor
**OPTIMIZER_MISMATCH - The optimizer environment does not match the existing child cursor.
For example:

select count(*) from emp; ->> 1 PARENT, 1 CHILD
alter session set optimizer_mode=ALL_ROWS
select count(*) from emp; ->> 1 PARENT, 2 CHILDREN

(The optimizer mode has changed and therefore
the existing child cannot be reused)

(The same applies with events - if I turned on tracing with 10046 than I would get the OPTIMIZER_MISMATCH again and a 3rd child)
OUTLINE_MISMATCH - The outlines do not match the existing child cursor

If my user had created stored outlines previously for this command and they were stored in seperate categories (say "OUTLINES1" and "OUTLINES2") running:-

alter session set use_stored_outlines = OUTLINES1;
select count(*) from emp;
alter session set use_stored_oulines= OUTLINES2;
select count(*) from emp;

--> Would create a 2nd child as the outline used is different than the first run.
STATS_ROW_MISMATCH - The existing statistics do not match the existing child cursor. Check that 10046/sql_trace is not set on all sessions as this can cause this.
LITERAL_MISMATCH - Non-data literal values do not match the existing child cursor
SEC_DEPTH_MISMATCH - Security level does not match the existing child cursor
EXPLAIN_PLAN_CURSOR - The child cursor is an explain plan cursor and should not be shared. Explain plan statements will generate a new child by default - the mismatch will be this.
BUFFERED_DML_MISMATCH - Buffered DML does not match the existing child cursor
PDML_ENV_MISMATCH - PDML environment does not match the existing child cursor
INST_DRTLD_MISMATCH - Insert direct load does not match the existing child cursor
SLAVE_QC_MISMATCH -The existing child cursor is a slave cursor and the new one was issued by the coordinator (or, the existing child cursor was issued by the coordinator and the new one is a slave cursor).
TYPECHECK_MISMATCH - The existing child cursor is not fully optimized
AUTH_CHECK_MISMATCH - Authorization/translation check failed for the existing child cursor
The user does not have permission to access the object in any previous version of the cursor. A typical example would be where each user has it's own copy of a table
**BIND_MISMATCH - The bind metadata does not match the existing child cursor. For example:

variable a varchar2(100);
select count(*) from emp where ename = :a ->> 1 PARENT, 1 CHILD
variable a varchar2(400);
select count(*) from emp where ename = :a ->> 1 PARENT, 2 CHILDREN

(The bind 'a' has now changed in definition)
DESCRIBE_MISMATCH - The typecheck heap is not present during the describe for the child cursor
LANGUAGE_MISMATCH - The language handle does not match the existing child cursor
TRANSLATION_MISMATCH - The base objects of the existing child cursor do not match.
The definition of the object does not match any current version. Usually this is indicative of the same issue as "AUTH_CHECK_MISMATCH" where the object is different.
ROW_LEVEL_SEC_MISMATCH - The row level security policies do not match
INSUFF_PRIVS - Insufficient privileges on objects referenced by the existing child cursor
INSUFF_PRIVS_REM - Insufficient privileges on remote objects referenced by the existing child cursor
REMOTE_TRANS_MISMATCH - The remote base objects of the existing child cursor do not match

USER1: select count(*) from table@remote_db
USER2: select count(*) from table@remote_db

(Although the SQL is identical, the dblink pointed to
by remote_db may be a private dblink which resolves
to a different object altogether)
LOGMINER_SESSION_MISMATCH
INCOMP_LTRL_MISMATCH
OVERLAP_TIME_MISMATCH - error_on_overlap_time mismatch
SQL_REDIRECT_MISMATCH - sql redirection mismatch
MV_QUERY_GEN_MISMATCH - materialized view query generation
USER_BIND_PEEK_MISMATCH - user bind peek mismatch
TYPCHK_DEP_MISMATCH - cursor has typecheck dependencies
NO_TRIGGER_MISMATCH - no trigger mismatch
FLASHBACK_CURSOR - No cursor sharing for flashback
ANYDATA_TRANSFORMATION - anydata transformation change
INCOMPLETE_CURSOR - incomplete cursor.
When bind length is upgradeable (i.e. we found a child cursor that matches everything
else except that the bind length is not long enough), we mark the old cursor is not usable
and build a new one. This means the version can be ignored.
TOP_LEVEL_RPI_CURSOR - top level/rpi cursor
In a Parallel Query invocation this is expected behaviour (we purposely do not share)
DIFFERENT_LONG_LENGTH - different long length
LOGICAL_STANDBY_APPLY - logical standby apply mismatch
DIFF_CALL_DURN - different call duration
BIND_UACS_DIFF - bind uacs mismatch
PLSQL_CMP_SWITCHS_DIFF - plsql compiler switches mismatch
CURSOR_PARTS_MISMATCH - cursor-parts executed mismatch
STB_OBJECT_MISMATCH - STB object different (now exists)
ROW_SHIP_MISMATCH - row shipping capability mismatch
PQ_SLAVE_MISMATCH - PQ slave mismatch
Check you want to be using PX with this reason code, as the problem could be caused by running lots of small SQL statements which do not really need PX. If you are on < 11i you may be hitting Bug:4367986
TOP_LEVEL_DDL_MISMATCH - top-level DDL cursor
MULTI_PX_MISMATCH - multi-px and slave-compiled cursor
BIND_PEEKED_PQ_MISMATCH - bind-peeked PQ cursor
MV_REWRITE_MISMATCH - MV rewrite cursor
ROLL_INVALID_MISMATCH - rolling invalidation window exceeded
This is caused by the rolling invalidation capability in DBMS_STATS. The child cannot be shared as it's invalidation window is exceeded. See:

Note:557661.1 Rolling Cursor Invalidations with DBMS_STATS in Oracle10g (Doc ID 557661.1)
OPTIMIZER_MODE_MISMATCH - optimizer mode mismatch
PX_MISMATCH - parallel query mismatch
If running 11.1.0.6 and RAC see Bug:7352775. Check that if (on each instance) parallel_instance_groups is set then instance_groups is set to the same.
MV_STALEOBJ_MISMATCH - mv stale object mismatch
FLASHBACK_TABLE_MISMATCH - flashback table mismatch
LITREP_COMP_MISMATCH - literal replacement compilation mismatch

New in 11g (incomplete):

PLSQL_DEBUG - debug mismatch Session has debugging parameter plsql_debug set to true
LOAD_OPTIMIZER_STATS - Load optimizer stats for cursor sharing
ACL_MISMATCH - Check ACL mismatch
FLASHBACK_ARCHIVE_MISMATCH - Flashback archive mismatch
LOCK_USER_SCHEMA_FAILED - Failed to lock user and schem
REMOTE_MAPPING_MISMATCH - Remote mapping mismatch
LOAD_RUNTIME_HEAP_FAILED - Runtime heap mismatch
HASH_MATCH_FAILED - Hash mismatch
Set to "Y" if sharing fails due to a hash mismatch, such as the case with mismatched histogram data or a range predicate marked as unsafe by literal replacement (See Bug:3461251)

Version_rpt script.:

The script. version_rpt can also be run to produce a summary report of the v$sql_shared_cursor view with additional diagnostic information. The script. can be found in:

Note:438755.1 Formatted V$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR Report by SQLID or Hash Value (Doc ID 438755.1)

Running the Script.
Generate reports for all cursors with more than 100 versions using SQL_ID (10g and up):

select b.* from v$sqlarea a ,table(version_rpt(a.sql_id)) b where loaded_versions >=100;

-- Generate reports for all cursors with more than 100 versions using HASH_VALUE:

select b.* from v$sqlarea a ,table(version_rpt(null,a.hash_value)) b where loaded_versions>=100;

-- Generate the report for cursor with sql_id cyzznbykb509s:

select * from table(version_rpt('cyzznbykb509s'));

What further tracing is available.

In 10G it is possible to use CURSORTRACE to aid the investigation of why cursors are not being shared. This event should only be used under the guidance of support and the resultant trace file is undocumented. To get the trace for a particular SQL statement you first of all need to get the hash_value (See the above select from v$sqlarea). You then set the trace on using:-

alter system set events
'immediate trace name cursortrace level 577, address hash_value';

(level 578/580 can be used for high level tracing (577=level 1, 578=level 2, 580=level 3)

This will write a trace file to user_dump_dest each time we try to reuse the cursor.
To turn off tracing use:-

alter system set events
'immediate trace name cursortrace level 2147483648, address 1';

Please note: BUG:5555371 exists in 10.2 (fixed in 10.2.0.4) where cursor trace cannot fully be turned off and single line entries will still be made to the trace file as a result. The w/a is to restart the instance. How invasive this BUG is depends on the executions of the cursor (and the size of the resultant trace file additions)

In 11.2 there is also cursordump:

alter system set events 'immediate trace name cursordump level 16'

(please ensure system , not session, is used as the level meaning changes)

This dumps some additional information such as expanding on the parameters for 'optimizer_mismatch' issues.

Are there any times when a high version count is expected even though BINDS are being used?

Consider the following where cursor_sharing=SIMILAR

select /* TEST */ * from emp where sal > 100;
select /* TEST */ * from emp where sal > 101;
select /* TEST */ * from emp where sal > 102;
select /* TEST */ * from emp where sal > 103;
select /* TEST */ * from emp where sal > 104;

SELECT sql_text,version_count,address
FROM V$SQLAREA
WHERE sql_text like 'select /* TEST */%';

SELECT * FROM V$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR WHERE kglhdpar = '&my_addr';

You will see several versions , each with no obvious reason for not being shared

Explanation:

One of the cursor sharing criteria when literal replacement is enabled with cursor_sharing as similar is that bind value should match initial bind value if the execution plan is going to change depending on the value of the literal. The reason for this is we _might_ get a sub optimal plan if we use the same cursor. This would typically happen when depending on the value of the literal optimizer is going to chose a different plan. Thus in this test case we have a predicate with > , if this was a equality we would always share the same child cursor. If application developers are ready to live with a sub-optimal plan and save on memory , then they need to set the parameter to force.

"The difference between SIMILAR and FORCE is that SIMILAR forces similar statements to share the SQL area without deteriorating execution plans.
Setting CURSOR_SHARING to FORCE forces similar statements to share the SQL area potentially deteriorating execution plans."

It is also possible to tell from 10046 trace (level 4/12 - BINDS) if a bind is considered to be unsafe
The flag oacfl2 in 9i and fl2 in 10g will show if a variable is unsafe.

BINDS #2:
bind 0: dty=2 mxl=22(04) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 acflg=10 oacfl2=500 size=24
offset=0
bfp=1036d6408 bln=22 avl=04 flg=09
value=16064
bind 1: dty=2 mxl=22(04) mal=00 scl=00 pre=00 acflg=10 oacfl2=500 size=24
offset=0
bfp=1036d4340 bln=22 avl=04 flg=09

In 10g (10.2.0.5) and 11g using the example query above this looks like:

alter session set cursor_sharing=force;
alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever,level 12';

select /* TEST */ * from emp where sal > :"SYS_B_0"
END OF STMT
..
BINDS #3071441600:
Bind#0
oacdty=02 mxl=22(03) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=10 fl2=0300 frm=00 csi=00 siz=24 ff=0
kxsbbbfp=295c96f0 bln=22 avl=03 flg=09
value=103

The "fl2=0300" entry indicates that this is and Unsafe literal and the bind was generated by replacement :

#define UACFBLTR 0x00000100 /* Bind was generated by LiTeRal replacement */
#define UACFUNSL 0x00000200 /* UNSafe Literal */

The 0x200 entry being the important flag for determination of literal 'safety'.
For additional details on this topic see:

Note:377847.1 Unsafe Literals or Peeked Bind Variables (Doc ID 377847.1)
Note:261020.1 High Version Count with CURSOR_SHARING = SIMILAR or FORCE

References

NOTE:377847.1 - Unsafe Literals or Peeked Bind Variables
NOTE:438755.1 - Formatted V$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR Report by SQLID or Hash Value

显示相关信息 相关内容

产品

Oracle Database Products > Oracle Database > Oracle Database > Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition
Oracle Database Products > Oracle Database > Oracle Database > Oracle Server - Standard Edition
Oracle Database Products > Oracle Database > Oracle Database > Oracle Server - Personal Edition

关键字

CURSOR SHARING; CURSOR_SHARING; HIGH VERSION COUNT; TROUBLESHOOT; V$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR; VERSION

返回页首

Troubleshooting: High Version Count Issues [ID 296377.1]